Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL has a global score of 81.3, which is much better than vivo X80 Pro's 72.6 overall score. Despite of the fact that Google Pixel XL is way older than the vivo X80 Pro, it's design is notably lighter and just a little bit thinner. The vivo X80 Pro has a better looking screen than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a bigger screen.
The vivo X80 Pro features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel XL, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel XL has a much greater hardware performance than vivo X80 Pro, although it has lesser cores and lesser RAM. Vivo X80 Pro features a way better camera than Google Pixel XL, because it has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a bigger diafragm aperture for better photos and videos in low light situations, a lot higher 50 MP resolution camera in the back and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The vivo X80 Pro has a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 4700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.