Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 516 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V20 is just a bit better than vivo X80 Pro, having a score of 77 against 72.6. LG V20's design is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the vivo X80 Pro, even though it was released many years before. The LG V20 counts with a much better processing power than vivo X80 Pro, although it has lesser cpu cores and lesser RAM.
The vivo X80 Pro counts with a brighter screen than LG V20, because it has a larger display, a just a little higher display pixel density and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px. LG V20 counts with a better storage for applications and games than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Vivo X80 Pro takes greater photographs and videos than LG V20, because it has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photographs, a lot better video quality, a bigger diafragm aperture and a back-facing camera with a much higher 50 MP resolution. The vivo X80 Pro features a really longer battery life than LG V20, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.