Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-05-18 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is better than vivo X80 Pro's 72.6 general score. The LG V50 ThinQ is an a lot older phone than the vivo X80 Pro, but LG managed to build it lighter and just a little thinner anyway. Both phones we compare here have Android operating system, but the LG V50 ThinQ has the previous 10 version and vivo X80 Pro has Android 12.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a lot better performance than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X80 Pro counts with a much better screen than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a bit worse display pixel density, it also counts with a little larger display and a slightly higher 1440 x 3200px resolution.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better memory capacity for applications and games than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Vivo X80 Pro has a greater camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a camera in the back with a way better 50 MP resolution, a much bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition.
Vivo X80 Pro features longer battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has an 18% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.