Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 13.2 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A7 (2018) has a score of 84.2, which is much better than the vivo X80 Pro's 72.6 score. Galaxy A7 (2018)'s construction is notably lighter and somewhat thinner than vivo X80 Pro, even though it was released many years before. Vivo X80 Pro has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a better amount of pixels per inch of screen, a little bit bigger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px.
The Galaxy A7 (2018) has a slightly bigger memory capacity for games and applications than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A7 (2018) features a much more powerful CPU than vivo X80 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The vivo X80 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a back-facing camera with much more megapixels, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and videos, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a much bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The vivo X80 Pro has a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.