Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 516 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a lot better than vivo X80 Pro, with a 91.8 score against 72.6. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is an older phone than vivo X80 Pro, but Samsung made it somewhat thinner and lighter anyway. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has 11 version and vivo X80 Pro has Android 12.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much faster processor than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X80 Pro has a much better screen than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a better 1440 x 3200 resolution, a bit bigger display and more pixels per inch in the display.
The vivo X80 Pro has just a bit better camera than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a camera with lot less MP resolution, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality, a lot larger back camera sensor and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos. The Galaxy A71 5G has a bigger storage for applications and games than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The vivo X80 Pro counts with a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a 4% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.