Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android |
| 2022-05-18 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is a lot better than the vivo X80 Pro, having a overall score of 90.5 against 72.6. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has Android OS, while vivo X80 Pro counts with Android 12 OS. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is an older device than vivo X80 Pro, but Samsung managed to make it a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with an extremely better processing unit than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Vivo X80 Pro features a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a bit bigger screen, a higher count of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels.
Vivo X80 Pro shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a way higher video definition, a more megapixels camera in the back, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor and a bigger aperture. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a slightly bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The vivo X80 Pro features just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.