Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2022-05-18 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 13.2 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro is better than the vivo X80 Pro, having a global score of 81 against 72.6. The Galaxy C9 Pro construction is a lot thinner and somewhat lighter than the vivo X80 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 5 years before. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Galaxy C9 Pro has the newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12 version.
The vivo X80 Pro features a much sharper screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a better amount of pixels per inch of display, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a little bit bigger display. The vivo X80 Pro has a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a much better hardware performance than vivo X80 Pro, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores. Vivo X80 Pro counts with superior battery performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity. The vivo X80 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a way better video resolution, a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a bigger aperture to take better low-light captures and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.