Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-05-18 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30s has an overall score of 83.3, which is better than vivo X80 Pro's general score of 72.6. The Galaxy M30s is an extremely older cellphone than vivo X80 Pro, but Samsung was able to build it a bit thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy M30s has older 11 version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12.
Vivo X80 Pro counts with a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a better pixels density. Vivo X80 Pro has more storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy M30s has a way better hardware performance than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The vivo X80 Pro captures better videos and photos than Galaxy M30s, because it has a higher 50 MP resolution camera in the back, a larger aperture for better images and video in low-light situations, a lot better video quality and a way bigger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy M30s has improved battery performance than vivo X80 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.