Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M31s is a lot better than the vivo X80 Pro, with a global score of 88 against 72.6. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy M31s has an older 11 version and vivo X80 Pro has Android 12 version. The Samsung Galaxy M31s is an older and a little thicker phone than vivo X80 Pro, but Samsung could make it just a little bit lighter anyway.
Samsung Galaxy M31s has a much more powerful CPU than vivo X80 Pro, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. The vivo X80 Pro features a brighter display than Galaxy M31s, because it has a little bit larger display, a better pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200.
The Galaxy M31s features a slightly bigger memory capacity for games and applications than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB. Vivo X80 Pro captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy M31s, because although it has a back camera with a lot lower 50 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger aperture and a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
Galaxy M31s counts with longer battery duration than vivo X80 Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.