Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a score of 87.1, which is much better than the vivo X80 Pro's 72.6 general score. Samsung Galaxy Note9 is an a lot older phone than vivo X80 Pro, but it's a bit thinner and a little lighter anyway. Galaxy Note9 counts with a very superior hardware performance than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The vivo X80 Pro counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a bit higher pixel number in each inch of screen, a little larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3200. Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a bit bigger memory to install games and applications than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB.
The vivo X80 Pro shoots way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video quality, a camera with much more megapixels and a lot larger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality photographs and videos.
The vivo X80 Pro has better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a 4700mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.