Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 5.1 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is a bit better than vivo X80 Pro, having a 79.3 score against 72.6. These phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has the older 5.1 version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is an a lot older cellphone than vivo X80 Pro, but Samsung was able to make it lighter and much thinner anyway.
The vivo X80 Pro features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a larger display, a bit higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a bit higher display density. The vivo X80 Pro features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a much better performing processing unit than vivo X80 Pro, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM and 7 lesser cpu cores. Vivo X80 Pro has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a way larger back camera sensor capturing way better quality photos, a larger diafragm aperture for better photos and videos in poorly lited environments, a much higher 50 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a way higher video definition.
The vivo X80 Pro has a very superior battery life than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.