Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 12 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2022-05-18 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 5.73 x 2.77 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| -- | $ 345.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 516 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 5s has a global score of 76.4, which is a bit better than the vivo X80 Pro's score of 72.6. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 5s has the newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12 version. Although Xiaomi Mi 5s is way older than vivo X80 Pro, it's design is notably lighter and thinner.
Xiaomi Mi 5s features a very superior hardware performance than vivo X80 Pro, although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster) and 8 GB lesser RAM. The vivo X80 Pro has a much better display than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has a way larger display, a really brighter display, a just a little more pixels per inch of display and a lot better 1440 x 3200 resolution.
The vivo X80 Pro has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The vivo X80 Pro has a very superior camera than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has a much better video quality, a larger camera aperture to capture better low light captures and videos, a much bigger back camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and pictures and a back camera with a way higher 50 MP resolution.
The vivo X80 Pro counts with a much better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.