Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 516 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is better than vivo X80 Pro, having an 85.5 score against 72.6. Despite of the fact that Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is noticeably older than the vivo X80 Pro, it's construction is just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter. The vivo X80 Pro has a better screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a higher 1440 x 3200px resolution, way more brightness, a bit larger display and a better pixels density.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a lot better processing power than vivo X80 Pro, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X80 Pro has a lot better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a bigger camera aperture for better low light photos and videos, a lot higher video quality, a much bigger sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality and a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a lot bigger storage for apps and games than vivo X80 Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a SD card slot that allows up to 256 GB. Vivo X80 Pro features improved battery life than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.