Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-23 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30 has a global score of 79.1, which is just a bit better than vivo X80's score of 74.1. LG V30 is an a lot older device than vivo X80, but it's extremely lighter and thinner anyway. The vivo X80 counts with a bit better performance than LG V30, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X80 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The vivo X80 counts with just a bit better screen than LG V30, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a lot lower pixels count per display inch, it also counts with a bit bigger screen. LG V30 features a superior memory for apps and games than vivo X80, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The vivo X80 takes slightly better photographs and videos than LG V30, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for taking photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a camera in the back with a much better 50 MP resolution and a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
The vivo X80 has superior battery performance than LG V30, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.