Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-04-23 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 387 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is a lot better than vivo X80, with a global score of 91.8 against 74.1. Galaxy A71 5G is an older phone than vivo X80, but it's a little bit thinner and just a little lighter anyway. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A71 5G has older 11 version and vivo X80 has Android 12.
The vivo X80 features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little bit lower quantity of pixels per inch of display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the vivo X80 also counts with a little bit larger display. The vivo X80 features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X80 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than vivo X80, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A71 5G also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a better camera than vivo X80, because although it has a smaller sensor which gives a worse photo and video quality, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy A71 5G's battery lifetime is just as good as vivo X80's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.