Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-04-23 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Black, Blue and Red |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M31 is better than the vivo X80, getting a score of 86.5 against 74.1. Samsung Galaxy M31's construction is just a little lighter than vivo X80, but it is just a little thicker and was released 2 years before. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy M31 has an older 11 version and vivo X80 has Android 12 version.
Vivo X80 counts with just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M31, because although it has a just a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit bigger display, a lot brighter display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The vivo X80 features a bit superior CPU than Galaxy M31, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X80 also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy M31 features a quite bigger memory to store more games and applications than vivo X80, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy M31 has a better camera than vivo X80, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing lower quality images, and they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy M31 also counts with a way more mega-pixels back camera.
Galaxy M31 counts with better battery performance than vivo X80, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.