Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-23 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Cosmic Black, Orange and Urban Blue | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 3050 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a score of 87.1, which is much better than vivo X80's global score of 74.1. Samsung Galaxy Note9 is an extremely older and a little thicker device than vivo X80, but Samsung managed to build it just a bit lighter anyway. Vivo X80 features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a little worse pixel quantity per inch in the screen and a much lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bigger display.
The Galaxy Note9 counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than vivo X80, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note9 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB. Vivo X80 features a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X80 also has more RAM.
Vivo X80 counts with just a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The Galaxy Note9 and vivo X80 both feature really similar cameras, because although the Galaxy Note9 has a lot tinier back camera sensor and a back facing camera with way less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.