Compare phones
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 59.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 4.3 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.23 x 3.25 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 490 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.03 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 2.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is much better than the vivo Xplay 3S, getting a global score of 81.3 against 59.5. The LG V35 ThinQ design is a little lighter and somewhat thinner than vivo Xplay 3S. Vivo Xplay 3S features a little more vivid screen than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a bit lower display pixels density and a quite lower resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels, they both have a screen of the same size.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better storage to install games and applications than vivo Xplay 3S, because it has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit more powerful processing unit than vivo Xplay 3S, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with more cores and a greater amount of RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than vivo Xplay 3S, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh. The LG V35 ThinQ captures much clearer videos and photos than vivo Xplay 3S, because it has a larger diafragm aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited situations, a much better 3840x2160 video definition and a higher 16 MP resolution back facing camera.
LG V35 ThinQ is a bit more expensive than the vivo Xplay 3S, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.