Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.4 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-15 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.32 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Bubblegum Blue, Peach Pink, Snowflake White and Truffle Black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 670 Prime, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4250mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is slightly better than the Xiaomi 11 lite 5G NE, getting an 83.8 score against 81.4. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison review, Samsung Galaxy A50 is an extremely older, just a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker cellphone than the Xiaomi 11 lite 5G NE. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a screen that is just as good as the Xiaomi 11 lite 5G NE one, although the Samsung Galaxy A50 has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a little bit smaller display and a quite worse pixels number per inch of display.
The Xiaomi 11 lite 5G NE counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi 11 lite 5G NE also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A50 takes much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi 11 lite 5G NE, because although it has a camera in the back with a way worse 25 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a way bigger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a larger diafragm aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi 11 lite 5G NE, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi 11 lite 5G NE counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has 4250mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.