Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-15 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.46 x 3.03 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Celestial Blue, Meteorite Gray and Moonlight White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than Xiaomi 11T Pro, with a 94.6 score against 85.2. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is thinner than the Xiaomi 11T Pro, but it's noticeably heavier and was released about a year before. Both devices in our current comparison come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any differences regarding that.
Xiaomi 11T Pro has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit greater pixel count in each inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit better processor than Xiaomi 11T Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a bit better camera than Xiaomi 11T Pro, although it has a back-facing camera with a way lower resolution, they both have a F1.8 aperture. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi 11T Pro, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi 11T Pro has a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.