Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2020-05-07 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Blasting black | Mirror black |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 484 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is better than LG Q70, having a global score of 90.1 against 77.9. Both phones in this comparison review come with the same Android 10 OS, so both should offer very similar operating system features. Although the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a better device than the LG Q70, we must note that it is also a way thicker and heavier device.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a little faster processor than LG Q70, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a slightly better looking screen than LG Q70, because it has a quite larger display, a just a bit greater pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a much better camera than LG Q70, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and a same size diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a lot bigger sensor providing a way better image quality, a back facing camera with a way higher 64 megapixels resolution and faster 60 fps video frame rate.
The LG Q70 counts with a better memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has superior battery lifetime than LG Q70, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.