Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2024-08-29 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Blasting black | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, with a 90.1 score against 81.9. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison, it must be told that it's also a way older, extremely heavier and noticeably thicker cellphone. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has 10 version and Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 version.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Both have 8 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a better display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, although it has a quite lower 1256 x 2760 resolution, a just a little lower quantity of pixels per screen inch and a little smaller screen.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a little bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a smaller sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and a same size camera aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with way more megapixels and higher 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with as much storage for applications, games, photos and videos as Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, both have the same 256 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has improved battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.