Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2024-04-16 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Blasting black | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a score of 90.1, which is a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's 87.1 overall score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has the previous 10 version while Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14 version. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a older, thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a more vivid display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, although it has a just a little worse pixels density, a lot worse 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little smaller screen.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro takes clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a way smaller camera sensor which provides a lot lower photo and video quality and a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher 64 megapixels resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a little better battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.