Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2021-11-18 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Blasting black | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 484 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is just a bit better than Moto G200 5G, getting a general score of 90.1 against 86.2. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has an older 10 version and Moto G200 5G has Android 11 version. Although it's the best cellphone we compare here, we must note that it's also an older, somewhat thicker and a little bit heavier cellphone.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro. Both have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a bit better screen than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because it has a bit greater pixel amount in each display inch, a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a little bigger screen.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a camera in the back with a lot worse 64 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photos in low light environments.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a much better storage for apps and games than Moto G200 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Moto G200 5G's battery life is very similar to the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.