Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-08 | 2018-06-29 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Blasting black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a general score of 90.1, which is much better than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play's general score of 76.3. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro's design is newer, but noticeably thicker and extremely heavier than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a little more vivid display than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a just a bit greater pixels density, a bigger display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a little better hardware performance than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking images in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with a way more mega pixels back-facing camera, a much larger sensor taking much better quality photos and higher video frame rate.
The Moto Z3 Play has a better storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a much better battery life than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.