Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-08 | 2019-10-16 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Blasting black | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has an overall score of 90.1, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 score. Although it's the best we compare here, Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is an a bit heavier and a bit thicker phone than nubia Red Magic 3S. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has older 10 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a bit better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels, a little larger display and a better pixels quantity per inch in the display.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with as much storage capacity for games and applications as Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, they have the same internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro shoots a bit better photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with faster video frame rate, a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality videos and photos and a back camera with lot more MP.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a battery duration that's just as good as the battery lifetime in Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.