Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Oppo |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2020-05-14 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Blasting black | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a general score of 90.1, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro's general score of 83.1. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro design is a bit heavier and thicker than OPPO Find X2 Pro. These phones include the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding OS features.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit better performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 and a quite higher pixels density.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has a tinier sensor giving a worse image quality and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with a much better 64 MP resolution camera.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with improved battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 17 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.