Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-08 | 2021-03-17 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blasting black | -- |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro's 90.1 global score. Samsung Galaxy A52 is a newer cellphone, and it's also somewhat lighter and thinner than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has more RAM.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A52, because it has a little larger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a quite greater pixel density. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro captures a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A52, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same resolution back facing camera, the same back-facing camera sensor size and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has faster 60 fps video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features a better memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.