Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2021-03-19 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blasting black | -- |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, having a 91.3 score against 90.1. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version and Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has Android 10 version. The Galaxy A52 5G body is newer, lighter and somewhat thinner than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a higher 1440 x 3120px resolution, a bit greater pixels density and a little bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a quite bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a little better battery performance than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro takes clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have a back-facing camera with a 64 mega-pixels resolution, a 0.59 inches camera sensor, a same size aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has faster video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.