Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2021-09-01 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blasting black | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s has a general score of 91.1, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro's score of 90.1. These phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy A52s has the newer 11 version while Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has Android 10 version, counting with some additional features. The Galaxy A52s design is newer, somewhat thinner and lighter than the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy A52s, because it has a higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution, a little bit better pixels density and a little bit bigger display. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A52s, and although they both have the same sensor size, the same diafragm aperture, the same video quality and the same resolution back-facing camera, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has faster video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy A52s has a bigger memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.