Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-08 | 2017-01-13 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Blasting black | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a general score of 90.1, which is better than the Galaxy A7 (2017)'s 75.8 overall score. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro's body is notably newer than the Galaxy A7 (2017)'s, although it is heavier and a lot thicker. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a little sharper display than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a greater screen density, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a bigger display.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a way better battery duration than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a greater camera than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a larger aperture, a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels and a much higher (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.