Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-08 | 2019-04-26 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blasting black | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is much better than Samsung Galaxy A70, having a 90.1 score against 76.9. Even though Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is newer than the Samsung Galaxy A70, it is much thicker and heavier. Both of these phones include the same Android 10 OS. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a bit better processing power than Galaxy A70, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A70, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120, a quite bigger screen and a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light photography, and they both have the same video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with a much larger sensor and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
The Galaxy A70 features a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A70, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.