Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2020-01-31 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Blasting black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 484 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A71, having a overall score of 90.1 against 87.5. Even being the best in this comparison review, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro design is somewhat heavier and notably thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A71. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has the previous 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A71 has Android 11 version.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy A71, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A71, because it has a little larger screen, a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 3120 resolution.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A71, and although they both have a same size aperture, a 64 MP back-facing camera, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same size camera sensor, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A71, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.