Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2021-02-22 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Blasting black | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 484 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy F62, having a 90.1 score against 88.1. Although it's the best device in our current comparison, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is an older, just a little thicker and a little heavier device than Samsung Galaxy F62. Both devices in our current comparison use Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has an older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy F62 has Android 11.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120, a bit larger display and a just a little greater pixels density. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy F62, because it has a larger number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 counts with a really longer battery duration than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because it has a 40% bigger battery size.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy F62, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 64 mega pixels, the same sensor size, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.