Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-08 | 2017-07-07 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blasting black | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, getting a 90.1 score against 80.4. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a noticeably newer device than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, although it's way thicker and notably heavier. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a display that is just as good as the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro one, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit worse resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better pixel amount per inch in the display.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a bit faster processor than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality photos and videos, a much better resolution camera and higher video frame rates.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.