Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2020-10-02 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Blasting black | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a general score of 90.8, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro's score of 90.1. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE design is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, even when they were released with only a few months difference. Both phones in this review use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has 11 version while Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has Android 10.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE's processing unit is just as good as the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro one, and although the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a just a bit better pixel quantity in each display inch, a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a quite larger screen.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a same size camera aperture and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a bigger sensor providing a better image quality and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has just a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.