Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2022-02-25 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blasting black | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has an overall score of 93.4, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro's overall score of 90.1. Both devices in our current comparison use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S22 has 13 version and Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has Android 10 version, so it offers some nice extra features. The Samsung Galaxy S22 construction is newer, extremely thinner and way lighter than the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a bit superior processor than Galaxy S22. Both have the same number of cores and 8 GB of RAM memory. Galaxy S22 counts with a sharper screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, although it has a quite smaller display, a just a bit inferior amount of pixels per inch of screen and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 and Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro have very similar cameras, because although the Samsung Galaxy S22 has a back-facing camera with a much worse 50 mega pixels resolution, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and photos.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has improved battery performance than Galaxy S22, because it has a 35% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.