Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2022-02-25 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Blasting black | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, getting a 95.4 score against 90.1. Galaxy S22 Ultra is a newer and thinner cellphone than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, but it is a bit heavier. These devices use Android OS, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version and Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has Android 10, so it counts with a couple additional features.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a brighter display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher count of pixels per display inch. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a bit better performance than Galaxy S22 Ultra. They have 8 processing cores and the same RAM amount. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro and Galaxy S22 Ultra both count with extremely similar batteries. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much better 7680x4320 video definition, a much bigger sensor shooting way better quality videos and pictures and a way higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.