Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-08 | -- |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | -- |
| 7.83 ounces | -- |
| Blasting black | -- |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S25, with a 90.1 score against 82.6. These devices come with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has 10 version and Samsung Galaxy S25 has Android 14 version. The Galaxy S25 has a sharper screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, although it has a just a little lower amount of pixels per inch in the screen, a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little smaller screen.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has more internal memory. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a very superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25. Both of them have a 8 GB RAM and 8 cpu cores. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with greater battery life than Galaxy S25, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Galaxy S25 shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has a much less mega-pixels resolution back camera, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.