Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-08 | -- |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | -- |
| 7.83 ounces | -- |
| Blasting black | -- |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, with a 90.7 score against 90.1. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a notably lighter and a lot thinner phone than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a more recent 14 version while Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has Android 10, so it provides you a lot of extra features.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a better display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel density. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro and Galaxy S25 Ultra both have incredibly similar storage to store more games and applications, both of them have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a very superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy S25 Ultra has a battery performance that is just as good as the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro one. Galaxy S25 Ultra captures much clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light situations, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor, a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a back facing camera with a much better 200 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.