Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-05-08 | -- |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | -- |
| Blasting black | -- |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a global score of 90.1, which is better than Galaxy S6 Active's general score of 80.9. Both devices in our current comparison use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has newer 10 version while Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0 version, giving you a couple nice extra features and a performance increase.
Galaxy S6 Active counts with a brighter screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has a really smaller display and a little bit lower 2560 x 1440 resolution, it also counts with a little better quantity of pixels in each display inch. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy S6 Active features a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has 5 GB less RAM memory, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an extra graphics co-processor and a 64 bits processing unit. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a back facing camera with a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution, a larger aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited environments and a lot larger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a really longer battery performance than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.