Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-08 | 2016-06-10 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Blasting black | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a score of 90.1, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's score of 75.8. Even though the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is noticeably newer than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, it is heavier and a little thicker. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better pixel density. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a way better resolution and faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features greater battery duration than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.