Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-05-08 | 2020-04-04 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Blasting black | Black |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 484 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a score of 90.1, which is much better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's global score of 80.1. Even though Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro and Galaxy XCover FieldPro were only released with a couple months difference, Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is much thinner and somewhat lighter. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has an older 10 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has a bit lower 1440 x 2560 resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater screen pixels density. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and videos, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution, a much higher resolution back facing camera and a lot bigger sensor.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.