Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2021-08-11 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Blasting black | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, getting a global score of 90.6 against 90.1. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has newer 11 version and Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has Android 10, so it gives you a couple additional features and performance optimizations. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 body is newer and much thinner, but heavier than the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a higher number of pixels per inch in the display.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a camera in the back with much more MP and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images and videos in low light situations. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 and Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro count with very similar memory for applications, games, photos and videos, both have equal internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.