Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-08 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is a bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 3, getting an 88.1 score against 86.6. Apple iPhone X's design is much thinner and incredibly lighter than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, although it was released 3 years before. IPhone X has a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has 5 GB less RAM and a lower number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
Apple iPhone X has a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher number of pixels in each inch in the screen and a quite better 1125 x 2436 resolution. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a much better camera than iPhone X, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back camera with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution.
IPhone X has much more storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a very superior battery duration than iPhone X, because it has 4720mAh of battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.