Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-08 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a general score of 86.6, which is a bit better than the Apple iPhone XR's general score of 82. Xiaomi Black Shark 3's body is newer, but somewhat heavier and thicker than Apple iPhone XR. The iPhone XR features a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The iPhone XR features a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, although it has a way worse resolution of 828 x 1792 pixels, a little bit smaller screen and a just a little less pixels per inch of display. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone XR, because it has more internal memory.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a much better battery performance than iPhone XR, because it has a 4720mAh battery size. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a way better camera than Apple iPhone XR, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, a F1.8 camera aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photographs and a back camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.