Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-08 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a score of 86.6, which is better than the HTC U Ultra's global score of 77. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is a much newer cellphone than the HTC U Ultra, but it is extremely thicker and incredibly heavier. The HTC U Ultra counts with just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The HTC U Ultra features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a bit better CPU than HTC U Ultra, because it has a higher number of cores and more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a really longer battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4720mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a greater camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has faster 60 fps video frame rates, a way bigger sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality and a back camera with a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.