Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches | 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver | Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 418 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo, getting a global score of 86.6 against 83.1. Both of these devices have Android OS, but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has older 10 version while Motorola Edge 30 Neo has Android 12. Even being the best in our current comparison, it must be told that it's also a incredibly older, a lot heavier and extremely thicker phone.
Motorola Edge 30 Neo has a display that is just as good as Xiaomi Black Shark 3's screen, because although the Motorola Edge 30 Neo has a little smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel density. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a bit better processor than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has more RAM.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have a same resolution camera in the back and a same size diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has a much better 3840x2160 video quality. Motorola Edge 30 Neo's memory to store more games and applications is very similar to Xiaomi Black Shark 3's one, both of them have the same internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with greater battery life than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has a 17% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.