Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, with a score of 86.6 against 81.9. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has older 10 version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 version. Despite being the best device in this comparison review, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 body is older, incredibly thicker and incredibly heavier than Motorola Edge 50 Neo.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a lot better looking display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better pixel amount per inch of screen and a bit higher 1256 x 2760px resolution.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 captures a little bit better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing lower quality pictures and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rate and a way better 64 megapixels resolution back camera.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features just a bit longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 4720mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.