Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Oppo |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X2, with an 86.6 score against 79.7. Both phones in our current comparison include the same Android 10 operating system. Even being the best in this review, it must be told that it's also somewhat heavier and extremely thicker. The OPPO Find X2 counts with a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has a greater amount of RAM.
OPPO Find X2 counts with a much better screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, and although they both have a same size screen, the OPPO Find X2 also has a better pixels count per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has just a bit better camera than OPPO Find X2, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for taking images or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor and a camera with a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
The OPPO Find X2 has a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a bit superior battery performance than OPPO Find X2, because it has a 12 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.